WIKIPEDIA IS USING NPOV THE WRONG WAY
When you say , we are using Normal Point Of View .
That doesn’t mean you go on offending other’s believe and say it’s just NPOV.
offending other’s is not normal , it’s so wrong .
When you are dealing whit other’s believes , you must respect it , never cross it’s line even if you don’t believe of it , cause it’s not your right to criticize or judge other’s believes on public sit , if you dont like it leave it .
It’s wrong when you edit others religion’s , cause you well never be fear whit what you don’t believe .
Don’t get the history of the west form the east . sense when you can talk and describe accident that you never be aware of .
And when you are dealing whit others prophets , you have to be resemble him exactly as he be in the true eye’s of his believers , and respect who they want you to Handel the article .
And we have a live example .
You can see that they try so many thing’s but nothing is approval for them .
They show the painting at the top , and they never want it to be removed , they never want to discus any thing truly and they mocked every idea have been suggested .
And there opinion is right what ever you say , even thou the painter of the picture is never munched at all in the history and never known who he is really.
They go on by applying their religious rules on others prophets and believer , all of it under the rule of NPOV.
